« Deutsche Bank expects substantial further write-downs from German banksDebt time bomb ticking? Robert Reich, former Labor Secretary and Stephen Moore, The Wall Street Journal advisory board, discuss »

Wall Street diseases

11/25/09

Permalink 06:02:42 am, by Warren Email , 207 words   English (US)
Categories: Central Banks/Government, Banks/Investment Banks

Paul P. Farrell about "Wall Street Diseases":

MarketWatch: Goldman's secret moral pathology, 15 symptoms of a Wall Street disease destroying democracy and capitalism, by Paul P. Farrell, Nov. 24, 2009

1. Gross denial of any moral damage caused by their rampant greed
2. Narcissistic egomaniacs with secret 'God complexes'
3. Paranoid obsessives about secrecy, guilt and non-disclosure
4. Power-hungry need to control government using Trojan Horses
5. Borderline personalities who regularly ignore conflicts of interest
6. Pathological liars incapable of honesty even with own investors
7. Sole fiduciary duty to insiders, not investors, never the public
8. Moral issues are PR glitches, violations of 'don't get caught' rule
9. Charitable donations are tax and PR opportunities, not moral issues
10. When exposed in a massive fraud, feign humility, fake an apology
11. When bankruptcy threatens, bribe friends in 'Happy Conspiracy'
12. Engage co-conspirators to cover up, distract, do your dirty work
13. As money-hungry vultures they will prey on vulnerable Americans
14. Treat everyone not in the 'Happy Conspiracy' with tough love
15. Addicts consumed by money: 'Jesus would throw them out ...'

This is at least some food for thought. I doubt whether in a still rather pluralistic world few single banks can control markets through conspiracy. Maybe the currently strongest ones have just better business models, risk control systems and people... Opinion are welcome.

1 comment

Comment from: maron [Visitor]
You are absolutely right. People believe too quickly in conspiracy if they see organizations which have become powerful. Of course, there is a lot of lobbying by bankers in political circles. But even this scene is pluralistic and somewhat self controlling. Look for example at Hank Paulson. He might have some bias towards banks such as Goldman Sachs. Is he still in power? Is his successor Tim Geithner close to Goldman? I would say no.

What I just said does not mean that we should not have mechanisms in place which help to control allocation of too much power. This is where regulators should become more creative. However, not in the sense of socialistic behavior but as guards of free market capitalism which avoid power accumulation effors.
11/25/09 @ 06:50

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)

Search

XML Feeds

EXCELLENT BBC FINANCE CRISIS GLOSSARY ________________________________________________________________________________

HEDGE FUND NEWS AND BACKGROUND INFO:

_________________________________________________________________________________

ASSET BACKED SECURITY INDICES:

_________________________________________________________________________________

BIGGEST STOCK EXCHANGES:

ranked according to size

_________________________________________________________________________________

VARIOUS LINKS PROVIDING VALUABLE MARKET INFORMATION:

_________________________________________________________________________________

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE:

_________________________________________________________________________________

BLOGS ABOUT INDUSTRIES:

_________________________________________________________________________________
February 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28            
multiblog platform