| « Princeton's Hyun Song Shin on bank equity and more | More on the capital requirements discussion for banks » |
Once again a paper which shows that knowledgeable, strong shareholders can have a major positive impact on the corporate governance of a cooperation. The opposite are corporations with atomistic shareholder structures, where managers can get too powerful and try to optimize their own interest by taking excessive risks at the cost of the owners.
Sanya, Sarah O. and Wolfe, Simon, Ownership Structure, Revenue Diversification and Insolvency Risk in European Banks (March 1, 2011). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1787476
Abstract:
"The financial crisis brought to light weakness in the assessments of risks and vulnerabilities in banks. Consequently, an insight into how the ownership structure of a bank affects investment decisions, performance and ultimately insolvency risk- the focus of this paper- is crucial. Our results show revenue diversification reduces insolvency risk in banks with concentrated ownership structure. This is because a large shareholder influences strategic decisions as a means to protect its personal wealth. The link identified between ownership concentration and revenue diversification is a novel way of analyzing the impact of the latter on insolvency risk in banks. The results also have important policy implications for regulators interested in understanding the role corporate governance in banks plays in mitigating systemic risk."
Keywords: European Banks, Revenue Diversification, Corporate Governance, Ownership Structure, Insolvency Risk