<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/3.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Behavioral Finance</title>
		<link>http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php?blog=2</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php?blog=2&#38;tempskin=_rss2" />
		<description>Behavioral Finance for Practioners</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=3.3.1"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
				<item>
			<title>Important academic paper on managerial miscalibration</title>
			<link>http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/12/22/important-academic-paper-on-managerial-miscalibration?blog=2</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 19:39:36 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>editor of MarketObservation.com</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Research</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">6753@http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;Important academic paper to &quot;calibrate&quot; judgement related to corporate decision making:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1640552&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;Ben-David, Itzhak, Graham, John R. and Harvey, Campbell R., Managerial Miscalibration (August 8, 2012). Charles A. Dice Center Working Paper No. 2010-12; Fisher College of Business Working Paper No. 2010-03-012; AFA 2007 Chicago Meetings Paper . Available at SSRN: &lt;a href=&quot;http://ssrn.com/abstract=1640552&quot;&gt;http://ssrn.com/abstract=1640552&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1640552&quot;&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1640552&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Abstract:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
      &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&quot;We test whether top financial executives are miscalibrated using a unique 10-year panel that includes over 13,300 probability distributions of expected stock market returns. We find that executives are severely miscalibrated, producing distributions that are too narrow: realized market returns are within the executives&amp;#8217; 80% confidence intervals only 36% of the time. We show that the lower bound of the forecast confidence interval is lower during times of high market uncertainty; however, ex-post miscalibration is worst during these episodes. We also find that executives who are miscalibrated about the stock market show similar miscalibration regarding their own firms&amp;#8217; prospects. Finally, firms with miscalibrated executives appear to follow more aggressive corporate policies: investing more and using more debt financing.&quot;&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Keywords:&lt;/strong&gt; Overconfidence, Behavioral Biases, Behavioral Corporate Finance&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/12/22/important-academic-paper-on-managerial-miscalibration?blog=2&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Important academic paper to "calibrate" judgement related to corporate decision making:</p>

<p><a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1640552"><u>Ben-David, Itzhak, Graham, John R. and Harvey, Campbell R., Managerial Miscalibration (August 8, 2012). Charles A. Dice Center Working Paper No. 2010-12; Fisher College of Business Working Paper No. 2010-03-012; AFA 2007 Chicago Meetings Paper . Available at SSRN: <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=1640552">http://ssrn.com/abstract=1640552</a> or <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1640552">http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1640552</a></u></a></p>

<p><strong>Abstract:</strong><br />
      <br />
<em>"We test whether top financial executives are miscalibrated using a unique 10-year panel that includes over 13,300 probability distributions of expected stock market returns. We find that executives are severely miscalibrated, producing distributions that are too narrow: realized market returns are within the executives&#8217; 80% confidence intervals only 36% of the time. We show that the lower bound of the forecast confidence interval is lower during times of high market uncertainty; however, ex-post miscalibration is worst during these episodes. We also find that executives who are miscalibrated about the stock market show similar miscalibration regarding their own firms&#8217; prospects. Finally, firms with miscalibrated executives appear to follow more aggressive corporate policies: investing more and using more debt financing."</em> </p>

<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Overconfidence, Behavioral Biases, Behavioral Corporate Finance</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/12/22/important-academic-paper-on-managerial-miscalibration?blog=2">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/12/22/important-academic-paper-on-managerial-miscalibration?blog=2#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php?blog=2&#38;tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=6753</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Investing: Battle Human Nature</title>
			<link>http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/10/22/investing-battle-human-nature?blog=2</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:49:19 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>editor of MarketObservation.com</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Research</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">6657@http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/</guid>
						<description>&lt;center&gt;&lt;iframe src=&quot;http://fora.tv/embed?id=13355&amp;amp;type=h&quot; width=&quot;400&quot; height=&quot;260&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; scrolling=&quot;no&quot; webkitAllowFullScreen allowFullScreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://fora.tv/v/13355&quot;&gt;Wall Street Investing: Battle Human Nature &amp;amp; Be Zenlike&lt;/a&gt; from &lt;a href=&quot;http://fora.tv/partner/Big_Picture&quot;&gt;The Big Picture&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;a href=&quot;http://fora.tv&quot;&gt;FORA.tv&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;











&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Keywords:&lt;/strong&gt; Behavioral Economics, Mental Accounting, Home Bias&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/10/22/investing-battle-human-nature?blog=2&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><iframe src="http://fora.tv/embed?id=13355&amp;type=h" width="400" height="260" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" webkitAllowFullScreen allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="http://fora.tv/v/13355">Wall Street Investing: Battle Human Nature &amp; Be Zenlike</a> from <a href="http://fora.tv/partner/Big_Picture">The Big Picture</a> on <a href="http://fora.tv">FORA.tv</a></p></center><p></p>











<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Behavioral Economics, Mental Accounting, Home Bias</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/10/22/investing-battle-human-nature?blog=2">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/10/22/investing-battle-human-nature?blog=2#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php?blog=2&#38;tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=6657</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Financial forecasts revisited</title>
			<link>http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/10/18/financial-forecasts-revisited?blog=2</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 05:28:18 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>editor of MarketObservation.com</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Research</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">6651@http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/fipfeddgw/106.htm&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;Ippei Fujiwara, Hibiki Ichiue, Yoshiyuki Nakazono, Yosuke Shigemi, Globalization and Monetary Policy Institute Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, 2012&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Abstract: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&quot;We test whether professional forecasters forecast rationally or behaviorally using a unique database, QSS Database, which is the monthly panel of forecasts on Japanese stock prices and bond yields. The estimation results show that (i) professional forecasts are behavioral, namely, significantly influenced by past forecasts, (ii) there exists a stock-bond dissonance: while forecasting behavior in the stock market seems to be herding, that in the bond market seems to be bold in the sense that their current forecasts tend to be negatively related to past forecasts, and (iii) the dissonance is due, at least partially, to the individual forecasters' behavior that is influenced by their own past forecasts rather than others. Even in the same country, forecasting behavior is quite different by market.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Keywords:&lt;/strong&gt; Investing, Forecasts, Herding&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/10/18/financial-forecasts-revisited?blog=2&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/fipfeddgw/106.htm"><u>Ippei Fujiwara, Hibiki Ichiue, Yoshiyuki Nakazono, Yosuke Shigemi, Globalization and Monetary Policy Institute Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, 2012</u></a></p>

<p><strong>Abstract: </strong></p>

<p><em>"We test whether professional forecasters forecast rationally or behaviorally using a unique database, QSS Database, which is the monthly panel of forecasts on Japanese stock prices and bond yields. The estimation results show that (i) professional forecasts are behavioral, namely, significantly influenced by past forecasts, (ii) there exists a stock-bond dissonance: while forecasting behavior in the stock market seems to be herding, that in the bond market seems to be bold in the sense that their current forecasts tend to be negatively related to past forecasts, and (iii) the dissonance is due, at least partially, to the individual forecasters' behavior that is influenced by their own past forecasts rather than others. Even in the same country, forecasting behavior is quite different by market."</em></p>

<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Investing, Forecasts, Herding</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/10/18/financial-forecasts-revisited?blog=2">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/10/18/financial-forecasts-revisited?blog=2#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php?blog=2&#38;tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=6651</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>about ego threat and self-regulation failures</title>
			<link>http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/10/13/about-ego-threat-and-self-regulation-failures?blog=2</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 09:50:12 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>editor of MarketObservation.com</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Research</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">6638@http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;Why &quot;social animals&quot; are often not the best investors:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dartmouth.edu/~thlab/pubs/93_Baumeister_etal_JPSP_64.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;Roy F. Baumeister, Todd F. Heatherton, Dianne M. Tice, When Ego Threats Lead to Self-Regulation Failure:
Negative Consequences of High Self-Esteem, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
1993, Vol. 64, No. 1,141-156&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The tendency for people with high self-esteem to make inflated assessments and predictions about themselves carries the risk of making commitments that exceed capabilities, thus leading to failure. Ss chose their performance contingencies in a framework where larger rewards were linked to a greater risk of failure. In the absence of ego threat, Ss with high self-esteem showed superior self-regulation: They set appropriate goals and performed effectively. Ego threat, however, caused Ss with high self-esteem to set inappropriate, risky goals that were beyond their performance capabilities so they ended up with smaller rewards than Ss with low self-esteem. The results indicate the danger of letting egotistical illusions interfere with self-regulation processes.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Keywords:&lt;/strong&gt; Investment, Psychology, Self-Esteem&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/10/13/about-ego-threat-and-self-regulation-failures?blog=2&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why "social animals" are often not the best investors:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.dartmouth.edu/~thlab/pubs/93_Baumeister_etal_JPSP_64.pdf"><u>Roy F. Baumeister, Todd F. Heatherton, Dianne M. Tice, When Ego Threats Lead to Self-Regulation Failure:
Negative Consequences of High Self-Esteem, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
1993, Vol. 64, No. 1,141-156</u></a></p>

<p><em>The tendency for people with high self-esteem to make inflated assessments and predictions about themselves carries the risk of making commitments that exceed capabilities, thus leading to failure. Ss chose their performance contingencies in a framework where larger rewards were linked to a greater risk of failure. In the absence of ego threat, Ss with high self-esteem showed superior self-regulation: They set appropriate goals and performed effectively. Ego threat, however, caused Ss with high self-esteem to set inappropriate, risky goals that were beyond their performance capabilities so they ended up with smaller rewards than Ss with low self-esteem. The results indicate the danger of letting egotistical illusions interfere with self-regulation processes.</em></p>

<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Investment, Psychology, Self-Esteem</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/10/13/about-ego-threat-and-self-regulation-failures?blog=2">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/10/13/about-ego-threat-and-self-regulation-failures?blog=2#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php?blog=2&#38;tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=6638</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Why are we often more impulsive than we might like to be?</title>
			<link>http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/10/09/why-are-we-often-more-impulsive-than-we-might-like-to-be?blog=2</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 04:06:20 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>editor of MarketObservation.com</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Research</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">6636@http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/more/2012-033&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;David K. Levine, Salvatore Modica, Federico Weinschelbaum, Felipe Zurita, Evolving to the Impatience Trap: The Example of the Farmer-Sheriff Game, Working Paper 2012-033A, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 2012&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Abstract:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&quot;The literature on the evolution of impatience, focusing on one-person decision problems, finds that evolutionary forces favor the more patient individuals. This paper shows that in the context of a game, this is not necessarily the case. In particular, it offers a two- population example where evolutionary forces favor impatience in one group while favoring patience in the other. Moreover, not only evolution but also efficiency may prefer impatient individuals. In our example, it is efficient for one population to evolve impatience and for the other to develop patience. Yet, evolutionary forces move the wrong populations.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Keywords:&lt;/strong&gt; Human Behavior, Patience, Impatience&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/10/09/why-are-we-often-more-impulsive-than-we-might-like-to-be?blog=2&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/more/2012-033"><u>David K. Levine, Salvatore Modica, Federico Weinschelbaum, Felipe Zurita, Evolving to the Impatience Trap: The Example of the Farmer-Sheriff Game, Working Paper 2012-033A, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 2012</u></a></p>

<p><strong>Abstract:</strong></p>

<p><em>"The literature on the evolution of impatience, focusing on one-person decision problems, finds that evolutionary forces favor the more patient individuals. This paper shows that in the context of a game, this is not necessarily the case. In particular, it offers a two- population example where evolutionary forces favor impatience in one group while favoring patience in the other. Moreover, not only evolution but also efficiency may prefer impatient individuals. In our example, it is efficient for one population to evolve impatience and for the other to develop patience. Yet, evolutionary forces move the wrong populations."</em></p>

<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Human Behavior, Patience, Impatience</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/10/09/why-are-we-often-more-impulsive-than-we-might-like-to-be?blog=2">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/10/09/why-are-we-often-more-impulsive-than-we-might-like-to-be?blog=2#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php?blog=2&#38;tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=6636</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Envy and altruism strongly affect the utility of investment choices</title>
			<link>http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/10/04/new-paper-finds-that-envy-and-altruism-strongly-affect-the-utility-of-investment-choices?blog=2</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 11:33:30 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>editor of MarketObservation.com</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Research</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">6635@http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2148874&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;Kaplanski, Guy and Levy, Haim, Investment Choices with Envy and Altruism (September 19, 2012). Available at SSRN: &lt;a href=&quot;http://ssrn.com/abstract=2148874&quot;&gt;http://ssrn.com/abstract=2148874&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Abstract:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&quot;Our experiment reveals that envy and altruism strongly affect the utility of investment choices: about 70% of the subjects reveal envy, 10% reveal altruism, while 20% are indifferent. Envious subjects even prefer an inferior First degree Stochastic Dominance (FSD) investment choice, provided that their peer groups lose more. We develop bivariate utility-free Stochastic Dominance (SD) rules with envy and altruism. Surprisingly, some non-pathological altruism preferences (let alone envious preferences) induce a reduction in the univariate expected utility of all parties. However, with the additive preferences, we identify important cases where the bivariate and the univariate SD efficient sets coincide.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Keywords:&lt;/strong&gt; Investment, Investment Choices, Altruism, Greed&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/10/04/new-paper-finds-that-envy-and-altruism-strongly-affect-the-utility-of-investment-choices?blog=2&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2148874"><u>Kaplanski, Guy and Levy, Haim, Investment Choices with Envy and Altruism (September 19, 2012). Available at SSRN: <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=2148874">http://ssrn.com/abstract=2148874</a></u></a></p>

<p><strong>Abstract:</strong> <br />
     <br />
<em>"Our experiment reveals that envy and altruism strongly affect the utility of investment choices: about 70% of the subjects reveal envy, 10% reveal altruism, while 20% are indifferent. Envious subjects even prefer an inferior First degree Stochastic Dominance (FSD) investment choice, provided that their peer groups lose more. We develop bivariate utility-free Stochastic Dominance (SD) rules with envy and altruism. Surprisingly, some non-pathological altruism preferences (let alone envious preferences) induce a reduction in the univariate expected utility of all parties. However, with the additive preferences, we identify important cases where the bivariate and the univariate SD efficient sets coincide."</em></p>

<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Investment, Investment Choices, Altruism, Greed</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/10/04/new-paper-finds-that-envy-and-altruism-strongly-affect-the-utility-of-investment-choices?blog=2">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/10/04/new-paper-finds-that-envy-and-altruism-strongly-affect-the-utility-of-investment-choices?blog=2#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php?blog=2&#38;tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=6635</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner on altruism</title>
			<link>http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/04/05/steven-levitt-and-stephen-dubner-on-altruism?blog=2</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 08:04:25 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>editor of MarketObservation.com</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Research</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">6451@http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;Are we really as altruistic as we might like to think?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;iframe width=&quot;560&quot; height=&quot;315&quot; src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/embed/pQItB5uoiHI&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Keywords:&lt;/strong&gt; Altruism, Self-Interest&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/04/05/steven-levitt-and-stephen-dubner-on-altruism?blog=2&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we really as altruistic as we might like to think?</p>

<p><center><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/pQItB5uoiHI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></center></p>


<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Altruism, Self-Interest</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/04/05/steven-levitt-and-stephen-dubner-on-altruism?blog=2">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/04/05/steven-levitt-and-stephen-dubner-on-altruism?blog=2#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php?blog=2&#38;tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=6451</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Good joke about investor psychology</title>
			<link>http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/01/24/good-joke-about-investor-psychology?blog=2</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:29:44 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>editor of MarketObservation.com</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Humor</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">6323@http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/</guid>
						<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Graham&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;Ben Graham&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; told a story 40 years ago that illustrates why investment professionals behave as they do: An oil prospector, moving to his heavenly reward, was met by St. Peter with bad news. &amp;#8220;You&amp;#8217;re qualified for residence&amp;#8221;, said St. Peter, &amp;#8220;but, as you can see, the compound reserved for oil men is packed. There&amp;#8217;s no way to squeeze you in.&amp;#8221; After thinking a moment, the prospector asked if he might say just four words to the present occupants. That seemed harmless to St. Peter, so the prospector cupped his hands and yelled, &amp;#8220;Oil discovered in hell.&amp;#8221; Immediately the gate to the compound opened and all of the oil men marched out to head for the nether regions. Impressed, St. Peter invited the prospector to move in and make himself comfortable. The prospector paused. &amp;#8220;No,&amp;#8221; he said, &amp;#8220;I think I&amp;#8217;ll go along with the rest of the boys. There might be some truth to that rumor after all.&amp;#8221;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/01/24/good-joke-about-investor-psychology?blog=2&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Graham"><u>Ben Graham</u></a> told a story 40 years ago that illustrates why investment professionals behave as they do: An oil prospector, moving to his heavenly reward, was met by St. Peter with bad news. &#8220;You&#8217;re qualified for residence&#8221;, said St. Peter, &#8220;but, as you can see, the compound reserved for oil men is packed. There&#8217;s no way to squeeze you in.&#8221; After thinking a moment, the prospector asked if he might say just four words to the present occupants. That seemed harmless to St. Peter, so the prospector cupped his hands and yelled, &#8220;Oil discovered in hell.&#8221; Immediately the gate to the compound opened and all of the oil men marched out to head for the nether regions. Impressed, St. Peter invited the prospector to move in and make himself comfortable. The prospector paused. &#8220;No,&#8221; he said, &#8220;I think I&#8217;ll go along with the rest of the boys. There might be some truth to that rumor after all.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/01/24/good-joke-about-investor-psychology?blog=2">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php/2012/01/24/good-joke-about-investor-psychology?blog=2#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketobservation.com/blogs/index.php?blog=2&#38;tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=6323</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
